Its flashy, it’s safer, and it’s befitting. It can accommodate a presidential entourage. And above all, it’s going to replace the Fokker 68, a.k.a. the flying coffin. A careful study of the features of the Falcon 900 would easily lead one to the conclusion that buying it may not be bad. It’s capable of military and civilian missions, transoceanic, three engines, glass cockpit, and so much more. I guess you would agree that this airplane is ok for a developing country like Ghana. Combined with our new Presidential Palace, it would complete the story of a country that has overcome its terrible political history and ready to take its rightful place in African and global affairs.
So why the media war between the two major political parties on this subject? Why are the voices of the other political parties if they still exist not heard on very important national issues like that of buying a new presidential jet? The answers to these may not be far if we take a critical look at past events. In 2007, the Ghana government led by Kufour initiated moves to acquire a new aircraft for the state under funding terms presumed to be most favourable. The responses from then Minority (the NDC) ranged from name calling to insults. Behaving like the desperate-for-power politician, the NDC applied its usual and most reliable tactic, populist sentiments to register their resistance to this initiative. Like a drunk who strips naked in a bar when drunk, they soon forget they stripped after becoming sober. Today, the government run by the NDC has forgotten the reasons it offered for rejecting the Kufour presidential jet proposal some barely three years on.
Listening to the doctor's response on the subject matter, one wonders if the NDC that sought political power in 2008 is the same party governing Ghana today. For a political party that hoped:
To reduce profligate expenditure and practice frugal spending;
To reduce the economic and social hardships faced by the poor;
To improve the lot of Ghanaians;
To improve safe water supply and sanitation;
To provide better education facilities for the younger generation; amongst others;
I wonder if buying a presidential jet within her first two years in office would help to achieve the above hopefuls. Yes, hopefuls because when we demand deliveries on the above, we are reminded that it’s a slow-but-sure trekking and that at the end of the four years we shall (though unlikely) commend her.
In simple language, then candidate Mills and his group included the buying of a new jet in their list of misplaced priorities and profligate expenditure by the NPP government. Even till date, the people in government remind Ghanaians of the bad state of the economy they inherited, and why it would take some more time for Ghanaians to smile again. These were some of their words during the campaign: "when children study under trees, healthcare is unaffordable, and Ghanaians are becoming poorer by the day, it is unwise to invest in the acquisition of a Presidential jet". Question: what has changed so significantly since 2007/08 to warrant the need to buy a presidential jet? If the reasons offered by the NDC in 2007/08 in relation to the subject matter were justified, why can't they be justified now? Can the same tags the NDC used for Kufour and Co. now be used for Atta and Co? Is it always the case that what is good for the goose must be good for the gander? Is the ruling party deeply reflecting on its past and present behaviour?
But why is the NPP crying foul now? Is it a question of who gets the 10%? Is it the case that they now understand the plight of the Ghanaian more? Or is it true that they are shocked by the quick u-turn of the Mills administration?
What about the CPP, PNC, and the rest? Do they have an opinion at all? How long would the Ghanaian be deceived? Is the Ghanaian politician a hypocrite or just a suite wearing liar?
Now, I know one thing for sure, the Fokker 68, a.k.a. the flying coffin is no longer air-worthy. It needs replacement - and this the two political parties agree on. But what I do not know is whether political dishonesty pays? NDC or NPP, it is a tool they employ in discussing national interests. Who benefits from such hypocrisy? Maybe in the past it has rewarded its faithful, but as I see now, your deceit would be exposed sooner than you expect. Your true character would become national knowledge and your defence may be: ‘is it the first time? Just as freedom demands and requires responsibility to achieve its essence, so does political power require and demand accountability. For a growing democracy like Ghana's democracy, citizens are so patient that they exercise their most potent demand for accountability through the ballot box. It seems their thumbs are more powerful than their voices and it is the only albatross on the politician. And we do accept that politicians are like diapers, they do require frequent changing to prevent bad odour and infections.

